The big analysis is up as a PeerJ pre-print

PeerJA  preprint of our manuscript detailing what we learned from the first three rounds of #SciFund is up at PeerJ!

Much of the analysis you will have seen already here, and the manuscript is in peer review (fingers crossed!) right now. But we’re happy to have pulled everything together. Enjoy, and let us know if you have feedback!

External links

To crowdfund research, scientists must build an audience for their work

#SciFund round 4 analysis

#SciFund round 4 has concluded. I’m kind of excited to crunch the numbers to see how this round did in comparison. I’d already compared the goals of round 4 to the previous three here.

The total amount of money committed across all 23 projects in round 4 was $55,272, bringing our total across all four rounds of the #SciFund chellenge to $307, 825.

Without a doubt, this is my favourite graph (click to enlarge):


We saw a big jump in the percent of projects completed. This is wonderful. This bodes well for some kinds of research projects to be supported through crowdfunding fairly consistently. A lot of the projects were ecologically oriented, so the full proposal success rates from NSF’s Division of Environmental Biology (dashed line) are a way to compare crowdfunding to traditional federal funding.

We still have to work on the dollars value of the individual projects (shown below), which is still low compared to federal grants. (Reminder: Dot is average, horizontal line is median, box is 50% of data, whiskers are 95% of data, stars are minimum and maximum.) Still, while I am disappointed in the amount, I am very happy with the trend. We are seeing steady growth, particularly in the top half of projects.


The growth is also apparent when we look at how close projects got to meeting their goal (indicated by dashed line). The average in this round of #Scifund was… 100%, or fully funded! Also note that this round saw the greatest overachievement we’ve ever had, with one project raising almost three times its project goal. I’ll discuss this particular rousing success in a later blog post.


In previous rounds, we’ve seen that the amount that people give tends to be pretty constant, meaning success is all about the number of donors you have. This trend continues, as we see the average donation is about the same as round 3, or even a little lower:


While the number of donors each project is attracting is, as expected, up a little bit from previous rounds.

Round_4_donorsOne of the slight surprises for me is how consistent this round in with the previous three. This surprised me because we switched platforms (from RocketHub to Experiment). These are two very different platforms, with different funding schemes (especially in how they deal with unfunded projects), and presumably different audiences. And yet the net outcome was not dramatically different.

If you want to play with the data yourself (and see a few measures I haven’t discussed here yet), they are deposited over at figShare.

Lucky last!

Lee Stanish

We are not done yet, my friends!

While most #SciFund projects closed out yesterday, Lee Stanish’s project, Can microorganisms help protect our groundwater from contamination by hydraulic fracturing?, is still running, with a few days left on the clock. Lee is past the halfway point, so her project could make its target with a little effort. And it’s on a topic very much in the news these day: fracking.

Read more about Lee and her project in this interview, posted a month ago! And as a teaser, here’s an out-of-context quote about a favourite story she has from her research:

Turkeys would gather around us while we sampled, including a young male who was ready to mate…

After you’ve read about her project, you should go to Experiment and back her project!

Three in one day!

three_a_daySeemingly from out of nowhere, Amanda Bachmann’s project, Discovering Backyard Biodiversity in South Dakota, has become our sixteenth fully funded #SciFund project. That’s officially just over two thirds of all projects funded in this round!

This is turning into a fantastic round of #SciFund! Go to Experiment right now and join the fun! Let6s see how many projects we can close out, and end this round on a high note!

Two out of three ain’t bad

Congratulations to Jason Finley for having his #SciFund project, How Does Technology Affect Our Memory?, hit its funding target!two_out_of_three

With this success, we have funded two out of three projects this round. Well, okay, 65%, but forgive a teensy bit of premature celebration. It’s still a lot of projects that have been successful this round.

We have a little under 48 hours to go, which is when things often get frantic and exhilarating! Stick around to see how many more projects we can fund! Remember, projects are funded either for the full amount, or not at all. Keep that in mind when you go to Experiment, and as you share projects by tweeting them, liking on Facebook, and giving them +1 on Google Plus!

I love fourteen!


Gareth Lock has passed the post on his SCUBA project, making it project number 14 to be funded in this round of #SciFund.

That puts us to 60% of #SciFund projects meeting their goals this round, which is a big step up from our last two rounds. It’s very exciting.

How many more projects can we fund with two days to go? Jason Finley’s project on how technology could affect memory is has jumped from the halfway point yesterday to over 85% today.

Kirk Kalani Hausman’s project, Exploring the Depths with the OpenROV submarine robot, is perhaps in the best position to make great gains in the last two days: it has the smallest target of any remaining project. And it’s a project to let kids explore the ocean with a robot! How cool would that be?

More challenging to finish (but also more exciting) is Lee Stanish’s Can microorganisms help protect our groundwater from contamination by hydraulic fracturing? project: it’s has one of the higher goals, but is now past the 50% mark. A big push at the end could do it!

Don’t just sit here! You should go to Experiment and support your favourite project! And share #SciFund on your social media networks! We need to spread the word!

Lucky 13

lucky_13Brian Clark is the participant who has become the thirteenth scientist to join #SciFund’s 100% club!

Brian’s project, “Sex in the sea: Uncovering the mating behavior of Giant Sea Bass” is notable for being the largest project we have successfully funded in this round – about 50% higher goal than the next biggest funded so far. In fact, it’s one of the largest amounts raised in #SciFund history. We’ve had over 150 projects in three rounds, and only four have raised more money and hit their funding targets than Brian’s project. Well done, Brian!

We have three days left. How many more projects can hit their targets? JasonFinley’s project on how technology could affect memory is past the halfway mark. So is Gareth Lock’s SCUBA project. Funding those two projects would mean 65% of participants reached their funding goals in this round!

You should go to Experiment and help this become the most successful round of science crowdfunding ever see!

Half and half (plus one!)

Congratulations to Jessica Rohde, who has become the twelfth person to have her #SciFund project become fully funded in this round!Two-Face

Jessica’s achievement is a big one for #SciFund, because it marks the first time fully half of our projects have reached their goals. In an age where over and over we read about the decline in the number of projects supported, #SciFund has seen an increase in the percent of projects supported. Every round.

It’s important to remember that Experiment uses the “stand or fall” model of crowdfunding. With four days left to go, it’ll be exciting to see how many more projects we might push past the finish line! We have three projects past the 50% mark. Currently, Brian Clarke has one of the bigger goals in this round, but is the closest to achieving his target. Other projects close to their goal include Gareth Locke’s SCUBA project, and Jason Finley’s memory and technology project.

You should go to Experiment to see all the great #SciFund projects in this round!

We have a new record!

new_record Earlier today, we noted:

In round 3, we funded 45.7% of projects. The next two projects in this round would put us at just under 48%, with the halfway mark – 50% of projects funded – tantalizingly close…

And now, Craig McClain’s woodfall project and Christopher Pincetich’s sea turtles project have made their targets! Congratulations to both!

One more fully funded project will put us over the halfway point. Could we fund Jessica Rohde’s science communication project? Or maybe study some deep sea lovin’ with Brian Clarke? Or memory with Jason Finley? You should visit Experiment and see!

Doing fine with number nine

Congratulations to Claire Regan! nineHers is the ninth #SciFund project to reach its funding target: Where is pollution entering the Chesapeake Bay watershed?

We may have to write another post about the latest 100% Club members. Craig McClain’s woodfall project and Christopher Pincetich’s sea turtles project have less than 10% of the way to go! If we fund those two projects, we will have a new #SciFund record for the highest percent of projects funded. In round 3, we funded 45.7% of projects. The next two projects in this round would put us at just under 48%, with the halfway mark – 50% of projects funded – tantalizingly close…

Don’t you want to be part of breaking a record? You should go to Experiment! Donate! Spread some link love!

#SciFund Challenge Round 4 with Laura Deighan

Each day we are going to highlight one of the amazing research projects seeking funding in Round 4 of the #Scifund Challenge. Today we get to speak with Laura Deighan as she speaks about how fisheries can be more ecologically sustainable. She also was the first project fully funded in this round, so just sit back and enjoy a good conversation!

Tell us about yourself, where you are from, and where you see yourself going.

I have lived in Delaware, Massachusetts, Florida, Virginia, and Washington – never too far from an ocean! I did my Bachelor’s at Florida Institute of Technology in marine biology. After graduating, I worked for a few years as an aquarist, taking care of fish, turtles, and invertebrates at an aquarium while I figured out what my next step was. I have always loved biology and science, but I believe that science is most meaningful when it is shared. Improving the state of our oceans requires the cooperation of people from many different roles – scientists, policy makers, the media, industries working on and in the ocean, consumers, etc. For this reason, I decided to pursue an interdisciplinary Master’s in Marine Affairs to add knowledge of social science to my biology background.

After graduating, I hope to work on the issues plaguing our oceans at a job that integrates science and policy in a way that is accessible to policy makers, industry, and/or the general public. Ideally, this would involve working on issues of sustainability within the seafood industry.


How did you get involved in your research project?

I started interning with FishWise, a non-profit working in sustainable seafood consulting, over the summer. In that role, I research and report on different fishery improvement projects (FIPs) that industry partners are involved in, which helps those companies evaluate and report on their participation in those FIPs. When I started out I didn’t even know what a FIP was! They are a pretty new tool just starting to gain traction in the realm of seafood sustainability, so little research has touched on their use. I decided that this was an area I wanted to focus on while working on my Master’s and chose it as my thesis topic.

Why is your research important to you? Why should others fund it?

I am really excited about the idea of FIPs. I am a big proponent of collaborative solutions to sustainability that involve industry. The people in the industry are the ones on the water doing the work and potentially impacting the environment, plus they have a wealth of knowledge that you don’t get from research. FIPs utilize this approach because the process is meant to be stakeholder driven and collaborative. If FIPs are going to be a viable option, we really need to understand them better- if they work, how they work, and why they work. My research is taking a small step toward this understanding, focusing on how they work.


Why did you decide to participate in the SciFund Challenge?

I knew participating in SciFund would push me to communicate more about my research. I know that there are people out there that care about sustainability in the oceans, and I want to help inform that audience. However, as a graduate student, life can be pretty busy, so it is nice to have the extra push to share my research.

What was the most difficult aspect of building your SciFund Proposal? What was your favorite?

It was difficult for me to figure out how to best present and talk about my topic in an accessible way. Not because I didn’t think people would get it, but because after being in a specific field for so long you start to lose touch with reality. Being in school, you are constantly surrounded by people talking about similar topics and using the same terminology as you, and you start to think everyone talks about those things. With all the terminology that comes with FIPs, it was difficult to know how to translate that.

At the same time, that may have also been my favorite aspect. It was exciting to think about how I could share the information with people that may not already be familiar with the topic and how to do so. I learned a lot from it.

Tell us something random. Something funny. Something borrowed. Something blue.

I am a huge marine turtle and iguana fanatic. I feel the same way about them as Kristen Bell feels about sloths and how that kid in Despicable Me feels about stuffed unicorns, minus the fluffy part (

I don’t eat seafood. I never really liked the taste and found out I was allergic to shellfish while prepping it as food for aquarium animals, but sometimes feel a little self-conscious about this. I got into this field because I am passionate about marine life and find the fishing and seafood industries fascinating.

You can read more about Laura’s research here.

The great eight

Congratulations for Monica Tydlaska are in order! Her project, How can we better protect the biodiversity of the rocky intertidal zones?, is the eighth in this round of #SciFund to be fully funded!Eight We now have funded over a third of projects in this round! Six are past the halfway mark, with a little over a week to go! Most projects of those projects only need a few hundred dollars to reach their targets.

Meanwhile, several of our completed projects continue to bring in backers, with David Shiffman and Erin Eastwood’s projects going well over their goals.

You should go to Experiment to see how your favourite projects are doing!


#SciFund Challenge Round 4 with Amanda Bachmann

Each day we are going to highlight one of the amazing research projects seeking funding in Round 4 of the #Scifund Challenge. Today we chat with Amanda Bachmann about how the people of South Dakota can become backyard scientists!

Tell us about yourself, where you are from, and where you see yourself going.

I’m originally from Pennsylvania, and I moved out to Pierre, South Dakota for my job with SDSU Extension. I’ve been interested in insects ever since I learned to identify a bunch of orders and families for the Science Olympiad event ‘Don’t Bug Me.’ When I was looking at grad school options, I realized that I could make a career out of entomology. My PhD work at Penn State focused on migratory pests of vegetable crops (I spent a lot of time with soybean aphids and striped cucumber beetles). My job focus is consumer horticulture, which means I interact mainly with homeowners about their plant problems and pest questions, and I develop related educational content for our extension website (

How did you get involved in your research project?

Backyard Biodiversity in South Dakota is something that had been proposed by a few of my colleagues at SDSU, but they didn’t have the time to get it off the ground so they passed it on to me. While I was at Penn State, I did a few side projects that involved pollinators so I had some knowledge of the area.

Why is your research important to you? Why should others fund it?

I think citizen science projects are a great way to involve the public in research and teach them more about how science works. I’m really proud of this project and the impact it’s having in South Dakota. Most of the 2013 participants have already told me that they’re planning on collecting data again in 2014. We have a very invested group of Master Gardeners and new volunteers who are excited about participating in 2014. If my crowdfunding is successful I will be able reach a wider audience including some of the youth and community gardens in the state. Also, in relation to pollinators, this project is something that people in South Dakota can participate in (by taking data and/or contributing to this campaign) and know that they are doing something concrete to help these beneficial insects.

Why did you decide to participate in the SciFund Challenge?

This is a project that can move forward with a small-ish amount of funding. Being in Extension, I also don’t have a lab in the traditional sense or a research appointment, so that eliminates quite a few traditional funding options. Also, I contribute to a lot of Kickstarter projects and I wanted to see what the experience would be like.

What was the most difficult aspect of building your SciFund Proposal? What was your favorite?

The most difficult aspect was definitely translating my science-y writing to regular English and extrapolating enough to make it make sense to someone who’s not me. My favorite part was seeing the finished project page and how everything came together.

Tell us something random. Something funny. Something borrowed. Something blue.

My first research project in college involved mapping parts of the east branch of the Chagrin River in Ohio for sea lamprey larva habitat.  I never encountered a baby sea lamprey, but I learned how to use surveying equipment, put my canoeing skills to good use, and only filled up my waders once. The next summer, I was in Adams County, Ohio for a month helping a PhD student with her field work and getting eaten alive by chiggers. After all of that, doing field work in an agricultural setting was comparatively very cushy.
The picture is from the 2011 Great Insect Fair. I’m with some of the Centre County Master Gardeners, and their work with the Snetsinger Butterfly Garden at Tom Tudek Memorial Park ( was definitely an inspiration for what I’m doing in South Dakota.

You can find Amanda’s project here.

Double sevens

diceOur first lucky seven goes to Lindsay Aylesworth, whose project Searching for Seahorses & Sustainability is our seventh project in this round of #SciFund to be fully supported! We now have just under a third of our projects to have met their goals, – and exceed them. All our funded projects have more than 100% funding. On this point, a special congratulations goes to David Shiffman, who has raised more than double his original goal!

Our second seven are the seven projects that have passed the halfway point in their funding! With eleven days left to go, we have a good shot at fully funding several of these. If we do, it would make this the most successful round of #SciFund to date in terms of percent of projects funded! The seven that are closest to their goal are:

You should go to Experiment and check out these projects! Support the ones you like. And remember, if you can’t support it with dollars, support it with a little social media love. Share the link, share the videos, spread the science!

#Scifund Challenge Round 4 with Brian Clark

Each day we are going to highlight one of the amazing research projects seeking funding in Round 4 of the #Scifund Challenge. Today we learn about Giant Sea Bass from Brian Clark. (Author’s note: no matter how badly you want these to be deadly monsters from the bottom of the sea, that you need to get in a giant mech suit to defeat, it is not going to happen…)

Tell us about yourself, where you are from, and where you see yourself going.

Hey I’m Brian, a grad student in my first year at California State University, Northridge. I’m from southern California but I’ve lived all over the state: San Diego, Orange County, San Francisco and now Los Angeles!

My current plan is to continue on to a PhD program at Scripps and continue in a life of research. I also hope to start an educational outreach program where kids of all ages get exposure to California Oceans and get them as stoked about marine science as I am.


How did you get involved in your research project?

During my undergrad I was given the opportunity to do a research project out on Santa Catalina Island, where I was looking at dominance behavior of Leopard sharks, Triakis semifasciata. One of the professors who came to my talk was so excited that I decided to do behavior research afterwards offered me a spot in his lab. Once I agreed to come check it out he proposed this awesome project where I would get to study the behaviors  of this super charismatic megafauna and I was sold.

Why is your research important to you? Why should others fund it?

Nobody really knows much about Giant Sea Bass. Studying their behavior is great way to learn about them and get others interested in doing research on them as well. Behavioral research basically disappeared when molecular biology “hit the scene.” This research is part of the revival of behavioral studies and organismal behavior is something that I have always been curious and passionate about. I want to aid in the preservation of this endangered fish and prove that behavioral ecology is still a relevant science. I would love for kids to be able to see the same fishes I got to see growing up in the wild and not just in aquaria.

Others should fund it because they want to learn more about Giant Sea Bass, they want to conserve a species that was almost fished to extinction. Or they think behavioral ecology is as cool as I do :)

Why did you decide to participate in the SciFund Challenge?

A professor at my school sent out an email about it and I’ve seen so many people raise money through crowdfunding. I figured it was worth a shot and regardless of reaching my goal, that it would be a great learning experience for myself.

What was the most difficult aspect of building your SciFund Proposal? What was your favorite? 

The most difficult for me was putting together the video, but at the same time it was my favorite. I have such a hard time being in front of a camera, I just get super nervous and forget what I’m trying to say. My lab partners and I sat around on a Friday night going around the lab trying to find the best places to shoot and every time I started to get nervous, they would say and do things that would make me laugh. It ended up being a really cool bonding experience for us and I plan on making a couple more to further inform and promote my research.

Tell us something random. Something funny. Something borrowed. Something blue.

I have to thank my mentors for inspiring me to push on in my field. They have done so much to help me get where I am today. Each one has their own catch phrase that  me that will stick for the rest of my life and I feel like everyone in research should live by these words.

“Science never sleeps.” –Dr. Karen Crow

“If science was easy, everyone would be doing it” –Dr. Peter Edmunds

You can find Brian’s project here.

The story behind Experiment’s new name

Cindy WuIn this round of #SciFund, we have partnered with the science crowdfunding site Experiment. Some of you may know that Experiment used to be Microryza. But have you wondered how the transition came about? It’s a great story, told by Rohin Dhar. Here’s a snippet…

Denny surfed the web, wistfully looking at domains that would not be theirs. On a whim, he typed in … The owner of wrote Denny back within 30 minutes. A few minutes later, they were on a Skype video call, even though it was around midnight. The owner of the domain loved the team’s mission. He had a masters in physics and had bought the domain in 1996 hoping that one day it would be used for some noble purpose.

You should go read the rest. And then, of course, hed to the sweet new website with the sweet, easy to remember name, and support your favourite #SciFund project!

Podcast! Get yer podcast!

microbe_postOn the Society of General Microbiology podcast, Lee Stanish does a little chittin’ and chattin’ about her #SciFund project, “Can microorganisms help protect our groundwater from contamination by hydraulic fracturing?

Go have a listen.  After listening, don’t forget to head back to the Experiment website to support Lee’s project or one of our many other fine projects!

Six makes a quarter

prisoner_number_6You know Erin?  You should. We profiled her yesterday.

Today, Erin tweeted:

MA summer research is officially a go! YESSS! Thank you #SciFund and all who contributed so far – on to the stretch goals!! #itneverends ;)

Congratulations to Erin for being the sixth participant in this round to become fully funded! This means that a quarter of our projects are fully funded after ten days in this round. Who will be our next finisher? Could it be Jessica? Or Lindsay? Or will a dark horse spring from the back of the pack to surprise us?

You should go to Experiment, watch some videos, find a favourite, and support it!

#Scifund Challenge Round 4 with Erin Eastwood

Each day we are going to highlight one of the amazing research projects seeking funding in Round 4 of the #Scifund Challenge. Today we meet up with the talented Erin Eastwood (she paints and sciences!) and she discusses the importance of understanding the movement patterns of fish in protected habitats in Fiji.

Tell us about yourself, where you are from, and where you see yourself going.

I was born and raised in Los Angeles, CA, and have been a total ocean nerd since the very beginning. I’ve been working within the marine science realm for about 5 years now, and have done everything from scrubbing tanks and chopping up fish guts as an Aquarist Intern at the Aquarium of the Pacific, to conducting my own research while snorkeling above glorious corals in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. I just moved to New York where I’m a first-year Master’s student in Columbia University’s Conservation Biology program, with a focus on marine conservation and science communication. In particular, I study coral reef fish and their population dynamics (check out my project to learn more!). I’m really interested in pursuing a career with an NGO or different on-the-ground type of organization, where I can actually BE the change that I want to see in the world.


How did you get involved in your research project?

I went to Fiji two years ago to help a friend with her research on marine protected areas. Specifically, she studies the way that baby fish and corals find their way to protected areas through their sense of smell. So cool right!? At first I was really much more interested in the experiments we were conducting and the science behind the research, but as I got to know the people we were working with and interacted with the community more and more, I began to truly appreciate how closely the Fijian way of life is connected to the health of their reefs. The work then became much more personal for me.

From that trip on, I have focused on the benefits of scientific research to nature AND to people. Protecting reefs and enabling people to pursue their livelihoods don’t have to be mutually exclusive. So basically when I was applying to graduate schools, I sought out a program that would enable me to look at conservation from both a social and ecological standpoint – and that’s how I ended up at Columbia with Josh Drew as my advisor. We have worked really hard to develop this project, which focuses on conserving marine ecosystems while also providing a safety net for the future of small reef fisheries.

Why is your research important to you? Why should others fund it?

Because our oceans need to be protected! And people also need to eat and make a living! Weirdly enough those two statements are often considered to be at odds with each other, so my research is basically a super small-scale attempt to reconcile the two.

Even though Fiji is far away, and the reef fish dispersal patterns I’m investigating are on a relatively small scale, it’s important to provide people who care with information they can use to make a difference. Namely, it’s important to help the Fijian people.

Do you have a favorite story that came from working on your research project?

Oh man, SO many favorite stories! I actually just asked a few of my lab mates about their favorite stories and we laughed for about a half an hour before I could decide on one. So, one of my favorites is from last summer in Fiji, when our entire lab went out to this village, Nagigi (pronounced Nai-ni-ni), to conduct a survey of their reef fish. One day the current was absolutely ripping, so we decided to snorkel out to a closer patch of reef to collect fish rather than go diving further out. Well, it turned out to be absolute mayhem. After we got to the patch reef and collected about 10 or 11 fish we all agreed the current was simply too strong for us to continue. We were all steeling ourselves for the difficult swim back, when my friend Amy and I spotted a lionfish floating away from the little patch reef! It must have gotten a dose of the anesthetic we were using but taken a very long time to be affected, because it was now motionless, being swept away from its reef by the current. Amy and I took one look at each other, and then dove after the lionfish – we spent the next 15 minutes or so engaged in what felt like an epic battle to get this little fish into our bag. We were pumping our legs, blowing air through our snorkels, trying SO hard to stay next to this lionfish in the current, trying not to touch it (the spines are poisonous!) while also attempting to guide it into our catch-bag – which was made of mesh, the WORST material to try to catch a spiny, poisonous animal! I think at one point we were laughing through our snorkels because of how ridiculously hard catching this inert, drifting fish was – but damn it, we would not let it get away! When we finally did get him into the bag, we both let out these ragged little snorkel-cheers and gave each other underwater high fives. It was the most interesting and hilarious workout I’ve ever done.


Why did you decide to participate in the SciFund Challenge?

Well, my decision to join #SciFund was actually born out of both necessity as well as alignment with my own interests. As a brand new grad student, finding funding for my research has been incredibly difficult, as grants open to students are extremely competitive and opportunities are few and far between. My entire last semester was basically spent in the library frantically hammering out grant proposals to the major sources of funding (*cough* NSF-please-fund-me *cough*) and trying to find the most obscure grants possible, and even after all that I knew there was a very low chance of me actually landing any of those funds. So, I decided to take matters into my own hands, and crowdfund my research!

I had heard of #SciFund from previous rounds, and the idea of learning how to communicate my science effectively while also putting together a crowdfunding project was really appealing. One of my favorite parts about being a scientist is sharing the crazy cool things I learn each day with my friends and family, and I LOVE the idea of expanding that audience out into the general public – what better way to do it than to take people with me (via the interwebz) as I conduct my research this summer??

What was the most difficult aspect of building your SciFund Proposal? What was your favorite?

I know people typically say the video, but weirdly for me, it was the title! I really wanted something catchy and fun, and initially came up with something like “Following Food Fishes in Fiji” (alliteration all day erry day), but I got a lot of great feedback that it wasn’t very clear, wasn’t informative enough, and maybe a little too cheesy haha so I ultimately went with something a bit more descriptive and clear – “Using DNA to Protect Fiji’s Fisheries”.

As for my favorite part, it was definitely the video. I loved making the stop-motion animation (even though it literally took me 5 hours to get those 1.5 minutes of animation recorded), and I am extremely lucky to have a younger brother who’s very editing-savvy – check out his production company,! – so he was able to help me out a lot. The only sucky part about making the movie was filming in 9 degree weather on the steps of the library at Columbia. It was absolutely beautiful, but also soooo very cold.

Tell us something random. Something funny. Something borrowed. Something blue.

One of my study species, the Daisy Parrotfish, wraps itself in a cocoon of mucus every night before it goes to sleep. Taking security blankets to another level.

You can find Erin’s project here.

Overnight developments


While you were sleeping, Walter Weare’s project, “What’s in that new TV screen?” because the fifth #SciFund project to meet it funding goals. More than one fifth of our projects are now fully funded! Congratulations to Walter for joining the 100% club.

Things will get harder from here on in/ We have now funded all our “three digit” projects. Everything left to fund is four digits (a thousand dollars) or more. But three projects now are more than halfway to their funding goals! You should go to Experiment, find your favourite project, and help make research a reality!